Over the past year I’ve posted a few times (here and here) about the Critical Neuroscience project. Now three of the people behind the effort (Suparna Choudhury, Saskia Kathi Nagel and Jan Slaby) have published a programmatic statement in BioSocieties: “Critical Neuroscience: Linking Neuroscience and Society through Critical Practice.”
Here’s their abstract:
We outline the framework of the new project of Critical Neuroscience: a reflexive scientific practice that responds to the social, cultural and political challenges posed by the advances in the behavioural and brain sciences. Indeed, the new advances in neuroscience have given rise to growing projects of the sociology of neuroscience as well as neuroethics. In parallel, however, there is also a growing gulf between social studies of neuroscience and empirical neuroscience itself. This is where Critical Neuroscience finds its place. Here, we begin with a sketch of several forms of critique that can contribute to developing a model of critical scientific practice. We then describe a set of core activities that jointly make up the practice of Critical Neuroscience as it can be applied and practised both within and outside of neuroscience. We go on to propose three possible areas of application: (1) the problems related to new possibilities of neuropharmacological interventions; (2) the importance of culture, and the problems of reductionism, in psychiatry; (3) the use of imaging data from neuroscience in the law as alleged evidence about ‘human nature’.
- Critical neuroscience and anthropological engagement
- Laurence Kirmayer, "Revisioning Psychiatry: Cultural Phenomenology, Critical Neuroscience, and Global Mental Health"
- Videos from "Critical Neuroscience" course
- The Neuroanthropology of Embodiment, Absorption, and Dissociation
- Videos of "Cultural Psychiatry: A Critical Introduction"