Fernando Vidal and Francisco Ortega’s Being Brains: Making the Cerebral Subject is a fine-grained account of the “neuro-” in a range of disciplines, and, importantly––crucially––, takes stock of the history and scope of this prefix. But more than this the book is an exploration, a critical engagement with the surge of brain-centered approaches to behavior, to physiology, to mind, to subjectivity, to art and creative enterprises and products––Being Brains is an invaluable appraisal of where those waves (many waves, different waves) crash and what they at times wash away. Vidal and Ortega ask (simply, provocatively), “How did the idea that humans are essentially their brains become thinkable?” (1)
The commentaries that follow offer broad and diverse readings of the book. We hope you enjoy.
Genealogy of the Cerebral Subject
Elizabeth Lunbeck
Harvard University
All of the Other Brains
Chloe Silverman
Drexel University
Historicizing the Brain
Martyn Pickersgill
University of Edinburgh
Knowledge about the Brain and Societal Interests
Frank W. Stahnisch
University of Calgary
A Reply:
The Neuro: Modernity, Community, and Critique
Fernando Vidal and Francisco Ortega
Similar Posts
- Autism, sociality, and human nature
- Tobias Rees's Plastic Reason: An Anthropology of Brain Science in Embryogenetic Terms
- Book Forum––Des Fitzgerald's Tracing Autism: Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and the Affective Labor of Neuroscience
- Book Forum--Elizabeth A. Wilson's Gut Feminism
- Top of the heap: Janelle Taylor and Hannah Landecker